Talk:Lightweight programming language
Appearance
![]() | Computing Unassessed | |||||||||
|
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was moved to Lightweight programming language –Juliancolton | Talk 02:24, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Lightweight languages → Lightweight Programming Language — "lightweight languages" doesn't seem like correct entry -> plural + unclear it's from the computer domain EnTerr (talk) 06:52, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Survey
- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''
or*'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with~~~~
. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
- Support move to Lightweight programming language, since it's not a proper noun. Jafeluv (talk) 09:15, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support lowercased - not a proper noun. 81.110.104.91 (talk) 16:34, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Discussion
- Any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Is this article notable?
The headline says it all. What do you think? Smlck19 (talk) 16:10, 2 January 2020 (UTC)