User:Mathilde04/sandbox
Categorization is an activity that consists of putting things (objects, ideas, people) into categories (classes, types, index) based on their similarities or common criteria. It allows humans to organize things, objects, and ideas that exist around them and simplify their understanding of the world.[1] Categorization is something that humans and other organisms do: "doing the right thing with the right kind of thing." The activity of categorizing things can be nonverbal or verbal. For humans, both concrete objects and abstract ideas are recognized, differentiated, and understood through categorization. Objects are usually categorized for some adaptive or pragmatic purposes.
Categorization is grounded in the features that distinguish the category's members from nonmembers. Categorization is important in learning, prediction, inference, decision making, language, and many forms of organisms' interaction with their environments.
Theories about categorization
The classical view of categorization
...
Conceptual clustering
...
Prototype theory
...
Social categorization
Social categorization consists of putting human beings into groups in order to identify them based on different criteria. Categorization is a process studied by scholars in cognitive science but can also be studied as a social activity. Social categorization is different from the categorization of other things because it implies that people create categories for themselves and others as human beings.[1] Groups can be created based on ethnicity, country of origin, religion, sexual identity, social privileges, economic privileges, etc. Various ways to sort people exist according to one’s ideals and values. People belong to various social groups because of their ethnicity, religion, or age.[2]
Social categories based on age, race, and gender are used by people when they encounter a new person. Because some of these categories refer to physical traits, they are often used automatically when people don’t know each other.[3] These categories are not objective and depend on how people see the world around them. They allow people to identify themselves with similar people and to identify people who are different. They are useful in one's identity formation with the people around him. One can build his own identity by identifying himself in a group or by rejecting another group.[4]
Social categorization is similar to other types of categorization since it aims at simplifying the understanding of people. However, creating social categories implies that people will position themselves in relation to other groups. A hierarchy in group relations can appear as a result of social categorization.[4]
Scholars argue that the categorization process starts at a young age when children start to learn about the world and the people around them. Children learn how to know people according to categories based on similarities and differences. Social categories made by adults also impact their understanding of the world. They learn about social groups by hearing generalities about these groups from their parents. They can then develop prejudices about people as a result of these generalities.[3]
Another aspect about social categorization is mentioned by Stephen Reicher and Nick Hopkins and is related to political domination. They argue that political leader use social categories to influence political debates.[2]
Negative aspects of social categorization
The activity of sorting people according to subjective or objective criteria can be seen as a negative process because of its tendency to lead to violence from a group to another. Indeed, similarities gather people who share common traits but differences between groups can lead to tensions and then the use of violence between those groups. The creation of social groups by people is responsible of a hierarchization of relations between groups.[5] These hierarchical relations participate in the promotion of stereotypes about people and groups, sometimes based on subjective criteria. Social categories can encourage people to associate stereotypes to groups of people. Associating stereotypes to a group, and to people who belong to this group, can lead to forms of discrimination towards people of this group.[6] The perception of a group and the stereotypes associated with it have an impact on social relations and activities.
The process of sorting people creates a vision of the other as ‘different’, leading to the dehumanization of people. Scholars talk about intergroup relations with the concept of Social identity theory developed by H. Tajfel.[5] Indeed, in history, many examples of social categorization have lead to forms of domination or violence from a dominant group to a dominated group. Periods of colonisation are examples of times when people from a group chose to dominate and control other people belonging to other groups because they considered them as inferior. Racism, discriminations and violence are consequences of social categorization and can only occur because of it. When people see others as different, they tend to develop hierarchical relation with other groups.[5]
See also: Social identity theory
[copied from categorization]
Conceptual clustering[edit]
Main article: Conceptual clustering
Conceptual clustering is a modern variation of the classical approach of categorization, and derives from attempts to explain how knowledge is represented. In this approach, classes (clusters or entities) are generated by first formulating their conceptual descriptions and then classifying the entities according to the descriptions.[7]
![]() | This is a user sandbox of Mathilde04. You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the place where you work on your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. Visit your Dashboard course page and follow the links for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |
- ^ a b McGarty, Craig, et al. “Social Categorization.” International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2015, pp. 186–191.
- ^ a b Reicher, S, and N Hopkins. “Psychology and the End of History: a Critique and a Proposal for the Psychology of Social Categorization.” Political Psychology, vol. 22, no. 2, 2001, pp. 383–407.
- ^ a b Liberman, Zoe, et al. “The Origins of Social Categorization.” Trends In Cognitive Sciences, vol. 21, no. 7, 2017, pp. 556–568.
- ^ a b Bodenhausen, Galen & Kang, S.K. & Peery, D.. (2012). Social categorization and the perception of social groups. 10.4135/9781446247631.n16.
- ^ a b c Tajfel, H. “Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations.” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 33, no. 1, 1982, pp. 1–39.
- ^ Hugenberg, Kurt, and Galen V. Bodenhausen. “Ambiguity in Social Categorization: The Role of Prejudice and Facial Affect in Race Categorization.” Psychological Science, vol. 15, no. 5, 2004, pp. 342–345.
- ^ Kaufman K.A. (2012) Conceptual Clustering. In: Seel N.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer, Boston, MA