Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2019/Candidates/David Fuchs/Questions

Individual questions

Add your questions below the line using the following markup:

#{{ACE Question
|Q=Your question
|A=}}

---

Question from Gerda

2. I commented in the Fram case, decision talk, like this. If you had been an arb then, what might you have replied, and which of the remedies under 2 would you have supported?

Questions from Newslinger

2. When, if ever, would discretionary sanctions be an appropriate countermeasure against paid editing?

4. To what extent, if any, should the Arbitration Committee endorse the adoption of two-factor authentication on Wikipedia?

Questions from Leaky caldron

2. You refer to a 9 years old candidate statement, assert that Wikipedia "is a different place than it was nearly 10 years ago" but continue to propose that you "think the role of the Arbitration Committee and how it should operate have stayed germane". Are these statements inconsistent and does this place you firmly as a no change candidate?

Question from Nosebagbear

2. Once the new ARBCOM is in we'll be seeing an "RfC [with] focus on how harassment and private complaints should be handled in the future.". Personally, what particular questions/aspects would you want to see discussed? Along with that, many candidates note a balance to be drawn, but where would you draw a line if given the choice?