Talk:Pseudorandom binary sequence
![]() | Computing Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | Computer science Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||||||||
|
Talk
"Pseudorandom binary sequence" should be written as "Pseudo-random binary sequence", because of hyphen rules! Greetings. (13.01.2010)
"value of an aj element is independent of the values of any of the other elements" Wouldn't "uncorrelated" be more apropriate than "independant" ? Olivier.rieux (talk) 14:36, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Please change the example in C to something more understandable. Is there a convention in Wikipedia about what to use to represent algorithms - in times gone by something like Pascal (called pseudo-Pascal) was used because it's almost the most readable code, whereas C is one of the worst. Robertpaynter (talk) 11:48, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Terrible
The author appears to be confused about the distinction between "introduction" and "hairy details". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.234.224.230 (talk) 01:22, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Generator example
C code, which is included in article can confuse readers. It prints generator's internal states instead of generated bits. — Vort (talk) 15:58, 2 November 2019 (UTC)