Talk:Procreate (software)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Procreate (software) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Apps C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps

C

This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Contribute to the project:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Good article nominations : Improve Application software, Facebook and Instagram to good article status
Stubs : Category:Mobile game stubs, Category:Stub-Class apps articles

Graphic design

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Graphic design, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of graphic design-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Graphic designWikipedia:WikiProject Graphic designTemplate:WikiProject Graphic designGraphic design
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

New article

I have just moved this article from user space, where it was mostly written by User:TaniaWalker who has disclosed her COI in the topic. I've looked over the article and confirmed that the topic is notable and that it is well sectioned, formatted and referenced, and suitable for article space. If anyone is concerned that any of it is out of place please edit as you normally would or raise the issues here. Just a request please to assume good faith and please do not bite the newcomers! -- Chuq (talk) 11:41, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An advertisement, not an encyclopedia page

Of all the ad-like "articles" I've ever seen on Wikipedia, this is the most clearly just an advertisement. At least, it's written *exactly* the way an ad for the company, by a paid marketer, would be written -- so I have to assume that's what it actually is.

An "article" like this debases Wikipedia.