Jump to content

Talk:Bluetooth mesh networking

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Boud (talk | contribs) at 01:32, 4 September 2019 (Search for an appropriate article title: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconTelecommunications Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Search for an appropriate article title

If I understand it correctly, the topic of this article is supposed to be one particular method of mesh networking over Bluetooth hardware. That particular method of mesh networking is managed by the Bluetooth company, and uses Bluetooth Low Energy as its networking protocol.

If that's right, then the problem is how to distinguish

  1. mesh networking over Bluetooth hardware (in general); versus
  2. mesh networking over Bluetooth hardware using the Bluetooth Low Energy protocol that Bluetooth (the company) wishes to promote as The Solution for mesh networking over Bluetooth hardware (which is a bit too long for an article title).

Capitalisation would be one way of distinguishing the two with compact titles, but the official Bluetooth pages that I see seem to interchange freely between capitalised and non-capitalised versions, fuzzing out the distinction.

Maybe:

  1. mesh networking over Bluetooth which would briefly refer to the officially preferred method and in general to other methods; vs
  2. Bluetooth mesh networking for the official article - this article right now mostly seems to concern that.

Any objections or better ideas? Boud (talk) 01:32, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]