Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RB Link

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Scott Burley (talk) 04:39, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RB Link

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An airline carrier established in July 2019 and having just 2 planes probably doesn't pass WP:NCORP. Bbarmadillo (talk) 21:34, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brunei-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:32, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:32, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:32, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The nom hasn't indicated why this is not a notable topic. The nom hasn't even determined if it's notable or not ("having just 2 planes probably doesn't pass WP:NCORP"). You don't nominate an article for AfD if you think something "probably" isn't notable. Easily found in-depth coverage of this scheduled service airline, like from Aviation Week, Air Transport World and Brunei News. [1][2][3]. Oakshade (talk) 01:00, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Oakshade. Nominator has clearly not considered WP:BEFORE. Bookscale (talk) 12:29, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.