Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 August 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Trialpears (talk | contribs) at 09:59, 1 August 2019 (Adding merge listing of Template:Infobox short story. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

August 1

Propose merging Template:Infobox short story with Template:Infobox book.
Only two fields not in Infobox book:

  • published_in: what the story was first released in, e.g. the name of the anthology, magazine, etc)
  • publication_type:how the story was first released, e.g. anthology, periodical, etc

These could easily be added to infobox book and then Infobox short story redirected. --Trialpears (talk) 09:59, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

INUNIVERSE extra infoboxes placed in addition to either Infobox book or Infobox character. The subpages are all hardcoded instances of the main template. I suggest deletion without substitution. --Trialpears (talk) 09:40, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The band's navigational template consists of seven links: the band's, one band member article, another band member that redirects to another band and four band links that should not be in the template. The band has no notable releases and the two links articles are already linked together so a navigational template is not necessary and WP:NENAN. Aspects (talk) 04:03, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, kingboyk (talk) 05:57, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The band's navigational template consists of seven links: the band's article, two member articles and four band links that should not be in the template. The band has no notable releases and the three links are already linked together so a navigational template is not necessary and WP:NENAN. Aspects (talk) 04:00, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, kingboyk (talk) 05:56, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Defunct sports franchise. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:39, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Some defunct franchises, like Carolina Diamonds include their final roster. Would it be preferable to just include the final roster on the page, instead of as a template? There's no shortage of templates.

Jjwyatt (talk) 08:03, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Convert to list of players Active rooster would be inappropriate if they aren't playing, but creating a list of players based on this template and it's history would be appropriate. --Trialpears (talk) 09:45, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, kingboyk (talk) 05:55, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]