Jump to content

Talk:Quantum machine learning

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fawly (talk | contribs) at 05:47, 27 July 2019 (Added template referencing split to Machine learning in physics). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Wadams3, Dbaror (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Moonunit42, Jfailla1.

"Connected contributor" tag

@Headbomb: I'm not sure if I understand this cleanup tag here. Do any of this article's authors have an apparent conflict of interest? Jarble (talk) 01:16, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Physics/Archive September 2018#COI/POV check at Quantum machine learning?. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 02:20, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposing Split

As far as I can see, there are two different things being talked about in this article at the moment. There's machine learning on quantum computers (section 1), and classical machine learning for quantum mechanics problems (section 2). I'd suggest that the former stay as Quantum machine learning (since it's the more common use for the phrase), and the latter move to Quantum machine learning (physics). Thoughts? ArguMentor (talk) 11:34, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the split, but Quantum machine learning (physics) seems more ambiguous than, say, Machine learning in quantum physics or a similar analog. 205.175.118.118 (talk) 21:42, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the split, and that Machine learning in quantum physics is a good choice for the new article. Maybe Machine learning of quantum physics, alternatively. Fawly (talk) 19:22, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Did a bold split; please let me know if I made any errors. Fawly (talk) 05:47, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]