Jump to content

Comparison of backup software

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AlexPPM (talk | contribs) at 13:38, 23 July 2019 (Open Source). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Feature comparison of backup software for a more general comparison see List of backup software.

Open Source

Package Network optimized (rsync) Versioning (diff, chunk, hardlink) Full client side Encryption Error Detection Simple server Distributed partials Renames optimized Web interface Webmin module
AMANDA ? ? Optional (separate download + cost)
Areca Backup ? ? No
Attic Yes Yes; Buzhash chunking[1] Yes; AES, SHA256 HMAC with PBKDF2 encrypted keyfiles[1] Yes; by MAC of plaintext and ciphertext No No Yes; through deduplication No No
BackupPC Yes Yes; hard-links No; but can be achieved via pluggable transfer mechanism No Yes; through deduplication Yes No
BackupVault Yes Yes; patching Yes Yes Yes No Yes; through deduplication Yes Yes
Bacula Yes; Incremental Yes Yes Yes
Back In Time Yes Yes; hard-links Yes; EncFS No No
BitTorrent Yes No No Yes No Yes No Yes ?
Borg
(fork of Attic)
Yes Yes; Buzhash chunking[1] Yes; AES, SHA256 HMAC with PBKDF2 encrypted keyfiles[1] Yes; by MAC of plaintext and ciphertext No No Yes; through deduplication (in development) No
Box Backup ? No No
Bup Yes Yes, chunk deduplication No Yes (Par2) Yes ? Yes, through deduplication Yes No
cpio No No No Yes No No No ? Optional (separate download)
Cobian Backup (v11) ? No ?
Cwrsync - Rsync for Windows Yes No No No No No No No No
DirSync Pro No No No
DAR No Yes; Incremental Yes Yes ? ? ? ?
dcfldd No No No No No No No No No
dd No No No No No No No No No
dump No No No No No No No No No
duplicity Yes Yes; Incremental Yes No Yes No No No
Duplicati Yes Yes; Incremental Yes No Yes No Yes No
FlyBack No ? No
git Yes Yes; snapshot No Yes No No Yes ? ?
git-annex Yes No Partial (with remote block device) Yes No Yes Yes No No
luckyBackup No No No
Mondo Rescue Yes Yes; Incremental No Yes ? No
obnam Yes chunk Yes Yes No No
Redo Backup and Recovery No No No
restic Yes Yes; Rabbin chunking[2]. Yes; AES-256-CTR, Poly1305, with scrypt encrypted keyfiles[3] Yes; through authenticated encryption and content-addressable storage using a cryptographic hash function Yes; supports both object storage and traditional cloud storage No Yes; through deduplication No No
rdiff-backup Yes Yes; reverse incremental No No No No Yes; via Third-party Yes
rsync Yes Yes; hard-links (--link-dest) No No No No No ? Optional (separate downloads)
star/gtar No Yes No No No No No ? ?
Zmanda Recovery Manager Yes ? ? No
zsync Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No No

References

  1. ^ a b c d anarcat. "document internals better". Github pull requests. Retrieved 29 January 2015.
  2. ^ "Introducing Content Defined Chunking (CDC)". 2015-09-12. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  3. ^ Valsorda, Filippo (2017-08-29). "Restic Cryptography". Archived from the original on 2019-05-11. Retrieved 2019-06-09. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)