Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 June 28

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Trappist the monk (talk | contribs) at 17:58, 1 July 2019 (Template:Cs1 function). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

June 28

Unused subpage of {{Calendar}} that was never utilized that was intended to be utilized for Wikipedia:Templates for discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 22:54, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In Citation Style 1 templates, the parameters subscription= and registration= are deprecated. Since the nominated template is only used on documentation for templates that transclude {{Subscription required}} or {{Registration required}}, this purpose of template is deprecated and following the directions in this template are now inaccurate since using the subscription= or registration= parameters in Citation Style 1 templates now returns a red warning message stating that the aforementioned parameters are now deprecated. Steel1943 (talk) 16:21, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Frietjes (talk) 14:31, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why shouldn't the text be changed in those transclusions that show deprecated parameters?

for {{subscription required}}:
change from:
{{cs1 function|by use of {{para|subscription|yes}} and {{para|via}}}}
to
{{cs1 function|by use of {{para|url-access|subscription}} and {{para|via}}}}
for {{registration required}}:
change from:
{{cs1 function|by use of {{para|registration|yes}} and {{para|via}}}}
to
{{cs1 function|by use of {{para|url-access|registration}} and {{para|via}}}}
for {{HighBeam}} – remove {{cs1 function}} from the doc page; as an aside, {{HighBeam}} should probably be the subject of some discussion somewhere because HighBeam is apparently defunct; where it is used, {{HighBeam}} is often coupled with a link to an archive of HighBeam's teaser page (a paragraph or maybe two from the source but no way to see the rest)
for {{InfoTrac}} (another template that perhaps deserves discussion because not used anywhere) modify the {{cs1 function}} transclusion on the doc page as described for {{subscription required}}
for {{Subscription or libraries}}, delete (because cs1|2 has never supported the 'libraries' component of that template; or, change:
from
{{cs1 function|by use of {{para|subscription|yes}} and {{para|via}}}}
to
{{cs1 function|by use of {{para|via}}}}

Trappist the monk (talk) 20:07, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:30, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:African Union with Template:Life in the African Union.
The contents in Life in African Union can to fit in African Union Template and more to it.Manabimasu (talk) 00:14, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Frietjes (talk) 14:32, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Clone in vertical form and expand - template:African Union is a horizontal footer template, and there needs to be a vertical template equivalent. Change name to template:African Union sidebox or similar -ApexUnderground (talk) 02:08, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:29, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedway in Poland navboxes

Propose merging Template:Team Speedway Polish Championship seasons, Template:Polish speedway teams, Template:Speedway Ekstraliga and Template:Speedway Ekstraliga seasons with Template:Speedway in Poland.
Procedural nomination on behalf of User:Abcmaxx who posted this at WP:PM with the following rationale: "It is essentially the same template and would be more beneficial to have just the one." Trialpears (talk) 16:28, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Frietjes (talk) 14:33, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:28, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also propose deleting-

Navbox with just one or two links. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:20, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:28, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The band's navigational template consists of five links: the band's article, three member articles and a member redirect to a different band that already link between themselves making this template unnecessary and WP:NENAN. Aspects (talk) 22:18, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:26, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The band's navigational template consists of three links: the band's article and two member articles that already link between themselves making this template unnecessary and WP:NENAN. Aspects (talk) 22:15, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:26, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A trivial template that fails WP:NAVBOX guidelines; basically nobody has actually accepted this prize, it's solely the pronouncements of one insignificant group. Only transcluded on one page now (disclaimer: after I removed it from some of the "winners"). Originally created by a now-banned editor. See also Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2019_June_21#Category:Confucius_Peace_Prize . SnowFire (talk) 21:28, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes (talk) 17:43, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:45, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]