Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Stranglehold

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Wrong venue. I'm closing this as an inappropriate nomination. You can achieve what you want by just redirecting the page. There really is no valid reason for deleting the history of the page. SpinningSpark 18:59, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Stranglehold

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Operation Stranglehold is a stub cited to a self-published source. The operation is better covered in Operation Raindance, which describes Stranglehold's origin as a followup to Raindance. With a more complete description with reliable cites, Raindance renders Stranglehold unnecessary. As the original author of both articles, I believe I have a right to request this as a speedy deletion. Georgejdorner (talk) 04:50, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 June 26. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:04, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:54, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:54, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.