Jump to content

Intelligence and How to Get It

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 100.34.139.116 (talk) at 06:23, 16 June 2019. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Intelligence and How to Get It
AuthorRichard Nisbett
LanguageEnglish
SubjectIntelligence
PublisherW. W. Norton & Company
Publication date
2009
Publication placeUnited States
Media typePrint
Pages304
ISBN0393071413
Preceded byThe Geography of Thought (2003) 

Intelligence and How to Get It: Why Schools and Cultures Count is a 2009 book about human intelligence by Richard Nisbett, a professor of social psychology at the University of Michigan. The book challenges the hereditarians' argument that IQ is entirely or almost entirely heritable, and argues that nonhereditary factors play a more significant role than hereditarians assert.[1][2] It also recommends how to tutor children so as to maximize their intelligence.[3] The book also argues that IQ scores are a reliable, though imperfect, indicator of general intelligence, while criticizing some of the assertions made about such scores in the 1994 book The Bell Curve. The book's appendix argues that racial differences in IQ are entirely due to environmental factors.[4]

Reviews

Writing for The New York Times, philosopher Jim Holt described the book as "a meticulous and eye-opening critique of hereditarianism."[1] The book was criticized by prominent hereditarians J. Philippe Rushton and Arthur Jensen in a 2010 paper. In their paper, Rushton and Jensen concluded that, contrary to Nisbett's conclusions, racial differences in IQ and other life history traits exist, and that "The group differences are between 50 and 80% heritable."[5] Psychologist Earl B. Hunt reviewed the book in the journal Intelligence, stating that "Nisbett is a very good writer, but he is a combative writer", and while "Nisbett is writing for a general audience" and "does so very well", Hunt argues that "Nisbett...goes too far in attacking discussions of the genetics of intelligence", that Nisbett's argument against the genetic origins of racial and ethnic differences was weakened by citing research on parenting practices without "[considering] the possibility that these practices may themselves be influenced by the parental genotype", and that Nisbett repeatedly attributed positions to unnamed "experts" without citation. Hunt concluded that "Presenting scientific findings, including controversies, to the general public is an honorable and important endeavor. In my opinion that goal is better served if the writer is specific about who said what, where, and is careful not to overstate his or her case."[6] Another unfavorable review of the book published in Personality and Individual Differences by psychologist James J. Lee also concluded that "Nisbett's arguments are consistently overstated or unsound" with regard to the heritability and mutability of IQ and racial differences in IQ.[7]

References