Talk:Invariant set postulate
![]() | Mathematics Start‑class Low‑priority | |||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Invariant set postulate appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 July 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Opinion
I'm looking at a passage in the current article that says
- According to Palmer this could resolve problems posed by the Kochen–Specker theorem, which appears to indicate that physics may have to abandon the idea of any kind of objective reality, and the apparent paradox of action at a distance.
My first thought on looking at this was, the Kochen-Specker theorem doesn't appear to indicate that. A later thought was that action at a distance isn't an apparent paradox. If these are opinions by Palmer, that isn't clear from the way the sentence is constructed, and the location of that sentence in the article might also not be the right place for an extensive description of these opinions by Palmer. (On Wikinews we'd say they need to be attributed.) --Pi zero (talk) 16:36, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
More recent sources
Here are some more recent sources, by Palmer:
"p-adic Distance, Finite Precision and Emergent Superdeterminism: A Number-Theoretic Consistent-Histories Approach to Local Quantum Realism" arXiv:1609.08148
"Lorenz, Gödel and Penrose: new perspectives on determinism and causality in fundamental physics" Contemporary Physics, 55:3, 157-178
"Bell's conspiracy, Schrödinger's black cat and global invariant sets" 373 Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A
"Invariant Set Theory" arXiv:1605.01051