Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Me and my robot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mathbot (talk | contribs) at 03:00, 25 November 2006 (Add link to edit summary usage for Me and my robot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Voice your opinion (0/2/0) Ending 02:41, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Me and my robot (talk ยท contribs) โ€“ A user who has done nothing but help. solid user Time is always right 02:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I accept Me and my robot 02:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog and Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
A: Fighting vandalism, blocking those who vandalize.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A: Creating pages for music singles
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: I have had no conflicts.
General comments

Discussion

Support

Oppose

  1. Nomination was made by single-purpose account. Likely sockpuppet. --Nlu (talk) 02:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose you have fewer than 100 edits, this means we don't have enough evidence to know whether you can be trusted with the admin tools. Your talk page shows you don't properly understand our image licensing policy, which is an important area for an admin to have experience in. I would add that accepting a nomination from an editor whose only edits are to nominate you is highly suspicious and speaks to a lack of judgement on your part. Sorry, Gwernol 02:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral