Nowhere-zero flow
In graph theory, a nowhere-zero flow or NZ flow is a network flow that is nowhere zero. It is intimately connected (by duality) to coloring planar graphs.
Definitions
Let G = (V,E) be a digraph and let M be an abelian group. A map φ: E → M is an M-circulation if for every vertex v ∈ V
where δ+(v) denotes the set of edges out of v and δ−(v) denotes the set of edges into v. Sometimes, this condition is referred to as Kirchhoff's law.
If φ(e) ≠ 0 for every e ∈ E, we call φ a nowhere-zero flow, an M-flow, or an NZ-flow. If k is an integer and 0 < |φ(e)| < k then φ is a k-flow.[1]
Other notions
Let G = (V,E) be an undirected graph. An orientation of E is a modular k-flow if
for every vertex v ∈ V.
Properties
- Orientation independence. Modify a nowhere-zero flow φ on a graph G by choosing an edge e, reversing it, and then replacing φ(e) with -φ(e). After this adjustment, φ is still a nowhere-zero flow. Furthermore, if φ was originally a k-flow, then the resulting φ is also a k-flow. Thus, the existence of a nowhere-zero M-flow or a nowhere-zero k-flow is independent of the orientation of the graph. Thus, an undirected graph G is said to have a nowhere-zero M-flow or nowhere-zero k-flow if some (and thus every) orientation of G has such a flow.
- If G admits a k-flow then it admits an h-flow where .
- The set of M-flows do not necessarily form a group as the sum of two flows on one edge may add to 0.
- (Tutte 1950) A graph G has an M-flow iff it has a |M|-flow. As a consequence, a flow exists iff a k-flow exists.[1]
Flow polynomial
Let N(G) be the number of M-flows on G. It satisfies the deletion–contraction formula N(G) = N(G / e) - N(G \ e).
Using this and induction, it can be shown that N(G) is a polynomial in where |M| is the order of the group M. We call N(G) the flow polynomial of G and abelian group M.
The above implies that two groups of equal order have an equal number of NZ flows. The order is the only group parameter that matters, not the structure of M.
The above results were proved by Tutte in 1953 when he was studying the Tutte polynomial, a generalization of the flow polynomial.[2]
Flow-coloring duality
There is a duality between region region-colorings and M-flows.
Let G be a directed bridgeless planar graph, and assume that the regions of this drawing are properly k-colored with the colors {0, 1, 2, .., k – 1}.
Construct a map φ: E(G) → {–(k – 1), ..., –1, 0, 1, ..., k – 1} by the following rule: if the edge e has a region of color x to the left and a region of color y to the right, then let φ(e) = x – y. Then φ is a (NZ) k-flow since x and y must be different colors.
So if G and G* are planar dual graphs and G* is k-colorable (there is a coloring of the faces of G), then G has a NZ k-flow. Tutte proved that the converse is also true (use induction on |E(G)| ).[1]
In general:
- Let for each region r be the coloring function
- Define where r1 is the region to the left of e and r2 is to the right
- For every M-circulation there is a coloring function c such that (prove by induction)
- c is a |E(G)|-region-coloring iff is a NZ M-flow (straightforward)
The duality follows by combining the last two points. We can specialize to to obtain the similar results for k-flows discussed above. Given this duality between NZ flows and colorings, and since we can define NZ flows to arbitrary graphs (not just planar), we can use this to extend coloring theory to non-planar graphs.
Theory
Just as no graph with a loop edge has a proper coloring, no graph with a bridge can have a nowhere-zero flow (in any group). Conversely, every graph without a bridge has a nowhere-zero Z-flow (a form of Robbins theorem).
Interesting questions arise when trying to find nowhere-zero k-flows for small values of k. Two nice theorems in this direction are Jaeger's 4-flow theorem (every 4-edge-connected graph has a nowhere-zero 4-flow)[3] and Seymour's 6-flow theorem (every bridgeless graph has a nowhere-zero 6-flow).[4]
Tutte conjectured that every bridgeless graph has a nowhere-zero 5-flow[5] and that every bridgeless graph that does not have the Petersen graph as a minor has a nowhere-zero 4-flow.[6] For cubic graphs with no Petersen minor, a 4-flow is known to exist as a consequence of the snark theorem but for arbitrary graphs these conjectures remain open.
See also
References
- ^ a b c Diestel, Reinhard, 1959- Verfasser. Graph theory. ISBN 9783662536216. OCLC 1048203362.
{{cite book}}
:|last=
has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ Tutte, William Thomas (1953). "A contribution to the theory of chromatic polynomials".
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help) - ^ F. Jaeger, Flows and generalized coloring theorems in graphs, J. Comb. Theory Set. B, 26 (1979), 205-216.
- ^ P. D. Seymour, Nowhere-zero 6-flows, J. Comb. Theory Ser B, 30 (1981), 130-135.
- ^ 5-flow conjecture, Open Problem Garden.
- ^ 4-flow conjecture, Open Problem Garden.
Further reading
- Zhang, Cun-Quan (1997). Integer Flows and Cycle Covers of Graphs. Chapman & Hall/CRC Pure and Applied Mathematics Series. Marcel Dekker, Inc. ISBN 9780824797904. LCCN 96037152.
- Zhang, Cun-Quan (2012). Circuit Double Cover of Graphs. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-5212-8235-2.
- Jensen, T. R.; Toft, B. (1995). "13 Orientations and Flows". Graph Coloring Problems. Wiley-Interscience Serires in Discrete Mathematics and Optimization. pp. 209–219.