Jump to content

Crack growth resistance curve

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Zwrouse (talk | contribs) at 21:30, 3 May 2019 (Undid revision 895381607 by Zwrouse (talk)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In materials modeled by linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM), crack extension occurs when the applied energy release rate equals , where the material's resistance to crack extension and can be conceptually thought of as the energetic penalty of an additional infinitesimal increment of crack extension. A plot of versus crack extension is called a crack growth resistance curve, or R-curve. A plot of energy release rate versus crack extension for a particular loading configuration is called the driving force curve, and the nature of the driving force curve relative to the R-curve determines the stability of a given crack.

The concept of R-curves is a more complex, but more comprehensive fracture criteria compared to the common failure criteria where fracture occurs when where is a scalar value called the critical energy release rate. An R-curve based failure analysis takes into account the notion that a material's resistance to fracture is not necessarily constant during crack growth.

Types of R-curve

Flat R-Curves

The simplest case of a material's crack resistance curve would be materials which exhibit a "flat R-curve" ( is constant with respect to ). In materials with flat R-curves, as a crack propagates, the resistance to further crack propagation remains constant and thus, the common failure criteria of is largely valid. In these materials, if increases as a function of (which is the case in many loading configurations and crack geometries), then as soon as the applied exceeds the crack will unstably grow to failure without ever halting.

Physically, the independence of from is indicative that in these materials the phenomena which are energetically costly during crack propagation do not evolve during crack propagation. This tends to be an accurate model for perfectly brittle materials such as ceramics, in which the principal energetic cost of fracture is the development of new free surfaces on the crack faces. The character of the energetic cost of the creation of new surfaces remains unchanged regardless of how long the crack has propagated from its initial length.

Rising R-Curves

Another category of R-curve that is common in real materials is a "rising R-curve" ( increases as increases). In materials with rising R-curves, as a crack propagates, the resistance to further crack propagation increases, and it requires a higher and higher applied in order to achieve each subsequent increment of crack extension . As such, it can be technically challenging in these materials in practice to define a single value to quantify resistance to fracture (i.e. or ) as the resistance to fracture rises continuously as any given crack propagates.

Materials with rising R-curves can also more easily exhibit stable crack growth than materials with flat R-curves, even if strictly increases as a function of .If at some moment in time a crack exists with initial length and an applied energy release rate which is infinitesimally exceeding the R-curve at this crack length then this material would immediately fail if it exhibited flat R-curve behavior. If instead it exhibits rising R-curve behavior, then the crack has an added criteria for crack growth that the instantaneous slope of the driving force curve must be greater than the instantaneous slope of the crack resistance curve or else it is energetically unfavorable to grow the crack further. If is infinitesimally greater than but then the crack will grow by an infinitesimally small increment such that and then crack growth will arrest. If the applied was gradually increased over time (through increasing the applied force for example) then this would lead to stable crack growth in this material as long as the instantaneous slope of the driving force curve continued to be less than the slope of the crack resistance curve.

Physically, the dependence of on is indicative that in rising R-curve materials, the phenomena which are energetically costly during crack propagation are evolving as the crack grows in such a way that leads to accelerated energy dissipation as the crack grows. This tends to be the case in materials which undergo ductile fracture as it can be observed that the plastic zone at the crack tip increases in size as the crack propagates, indicating that an increasing amount of energy must be dissipated to plastic deformation as the crack continues to grow. In real materials, does not continue to increase to infinity as , and instead will asymptotically approach some steady-state value after a finite amount of crack growth.

Falling R-Curves

While far less common, some materials can exhibit falling R-curves ( increases as increases). In materials with falling R-curves, as a crack propagates, the resistance to further crack propagation drops, and it requires less and less applied in order to achieve each subsequent increment of crack extension . These materials would exhibit highly unstable crack growth as soon as an initial crack began to propagate.

Some metals which fail primarily by cleavage can exhibit falling R-curves as cleavage propagation is unstable and very high strain-rates are found near the crack tips which increasingly suppress plastic deformation as the crack accelerates. Materials which exhibit strain-softening characteristics (rather than strain hardening) may also exhibit falling R-curves.

Effect of size and shape

Size and geometry also plays a role in determining the shape of the R curve. A crack in a thin sheet tends to produce a steeper R curve than a crack in a thick plate because there is a low degree of stress triaxiality at the crack tip in the thin sheet while the material near the tip of the crack in the thick plate may be in plane strain. The R curve can also change at free boundaries in the structure. Thus, a wide plate may exhibit a somewhat different crack growth resistance behavior than a narrow plate of the same material. Ideally, the R curve, as well as other measures of fracture toughness, is a property only of the material and does not depend on the size or shape of the cracked body. Much of fracture mechanics is predicated on the assumption that fracture toughness is a material property.

Testing

ASTM evolved a standard practice for determining R-curves to accommodate the widespread need for this type of data. While the materials to which this standard practice can be applied are not restricted by strength, thickness or toughness, the test specimens must be of sufficient size to remain predominantly elastic throughout the test. The size requirement is to ensure the validity of the linear elastic fracture mechanics calculations. Specimens of standard proportions are required, but size is variable, adjusted for yield strength and toughness of the material considered.

ASTM Standard E561 covers the determination of R-curves using a middle cracked tension panel [M(T)], compact tension [C(T)], and crack-line-wedge-loaded [C(W)] specimens. While the C(W) specimen had gained substantial popularity for collecting KR curve data, many organizations still conduct wide panel, center cracked tension tests to obtain fracture toughness data. As with the plane-strain fracture toughness standard, ASTM E399, the planar dimensions of the specimens are sized to ensure that nominal elastic conditions are met. For the M(T) specimen, the width (W) and half crack size (a) must be chosen so that the remaining ligament is below net section yielding at failure.

  • Anderson, T.L. Fracture Mechanics Fundamentals and Applications. Taylor and Francis.
  • "DTDHandbook | Damage Tolerance Testing | Material Tests | Fracture Toughness Testing Methods | R-Curve". Afgrow.net. Retrieved 2013-05-18.

References