Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 April 8
April 8
- File:Pgproductions.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by TheCustomOfLife (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This screenshot of the logo of Procter & Gamble Productions would be appropriate in an infobox on Procter & Gamble Productions if it had ever been an artice, but in a section of Procter & Gamble with no commentary about the image it does not appear to meet WP:NFCCP#8 as it doesn't significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, nor does it appear to me to meet the purpose listed in the rationale, "The image is used to identify the brand Procter & Gamble, a subject of public interest. The significance of the logo is to help the reader identify the brand, assure the readers that they have reached the right article containing critical commentary about the brand, and illustrate the nature of the brand in a way that words alone could not convey." ★ Bigr Tex 00:30, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- File:Tigres UANL.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Yxifix (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
When this logo was uploaded, it probably went in the Infobox of Tigres UANL as explained in the rationale's Purpose and "help the reader identify the organization, assure the readers that they have reached the right article containing critical commentary about the organization, and illustrate the organization's intended branding message in a way that words alone could not convey." However, since then it has been moved to a gallery of historic shields and is no longer doing any of those things and no longer meets WP:NFCCP#8 because it does not "significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic." ★ Bigr Tex 00:46, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:45, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - historical club logos are valid and useful, it probably just needs re-locating to a better section. GiantSnowman 10:52, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as current.y used in the article, it is a clear fail on WP:NFCC#8 as the image is used simply in gallery. If there were significant sourced commentary about the logo, then it's a different situation. -- Whpq (talk) 13:43, 8 April 2019 (UTC)