Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 April 3

< April 2	April 4 >

April 3

File:Chapel of the Holy Shroud Altar Under Construction.jpg

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chapel of Chapel of the Holy Shroud Altar Under Construction.jpg FASTILY 22:36, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:19, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Seems historically significant enough, and free. -John M Wolfson (talk) 01:10, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Xbox avatar files

Excessive (WP:NFCC#3a) non-free content that is not the subject of sourced critical commentary (WP:NFCC#8). — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:22, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - way excessive -- Whpq (talk) 00:36, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:2017 johzvsroyal.jpg

Metadata shows the image has been copied from Facebook. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 04:00, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Given the uploader's copyright violations on Commons, and the EXIF showing this is from Facebook, the claim to being the copyright holder is dubious. -- Whpq (talk) 00:33, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Turbo Launcher.png

No evidence that the photo wallpaper is freely licensed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:08, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It's also an orphan, FWIW. -John M Wolfson (talk) 01:11, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete orphaned non free file that was licensed as own work but isn’t. --𝕒𝕥𝕠𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕕𝕣𝕒𝕘𝕠𝕟𝟙𝟛𝟞 🗨️ 🖊️ 01:42, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:1910 Jack Pease.jpg

This file already available with higher resolution on Commons (c:File:1910 Jack Pease.jpg). I believe there's no reason for us to keep using the low resolution version. --AldNon^Ucallin?☎ 10:42, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I would delete this as a replaceable low resolution file. The commons image was most likely made from the higher resolution tiff file at the LOC. ww2censor (talk) 13:24, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burial ground at Millbank Prison.JPG

There's file with higher resolution on Commons (c:File:Burial ground at Millbank Prison.JPG). I believe there's no reason for us to keep using the lower resolution version. --AldNon^Ucallin?☎ 10:45, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The choice of file and resolution is a matter of editorial discretion. As the file is used for a variety of articles of high quality, we should leave well alone to minimise disruption. Andrew D. (talk) 11:07, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Replace The Commons version is a lot clearer. The file names are the same, so disruption should be minimal to nil. Why not make things better? Sario528 (talk) 11:19, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Replace It looks a lot better, and a thumbnail of this would look at lot better than the current Wikipedia version. Abzeronow (talk) 21:30, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]