Talk:Scaled Agile Framework/Archive 1
Redirect to:
- From a page move: This is a redirect from a page that has been moved (renamed). This page was kept as a redirect to avoid breaking links, both internal and external, that may have been made to the old page name.
New section on challenges of scaling
Now restructured the lead/lede paragraph to provide a more holistic overview, and introduced a new section on the challenges of scaling that SAFe seeks to address, which is the context for most of the criticisms. This means the article now includes more criticism, and there are more cited references for all the points. The 3 level vs 4 level section still needs sorting out, because it is based on SAFe v4.0. But that can be for another editor or another day. Davidjcmorris Talk 17:48, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Capitalization of frameworks
The MOS:CAPS states that "only words and phrases that are consistently capitalized in a substantial majority of independent, reliable sources are capitalized in Wikipedia". Software development frameworks such as Disciplined Agile Delivery (DAD), Large-Scaled Scrum (LeSS), and the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) are either formal trademarks or recognized and used in the form of capitalization. These terms should be expressed in this way. The exception being the article title, which I already rest to Scaled agile framework (ie, with leading capital only). Davidjcmorris Talk 22:03, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Is that really the case? I will revert. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:48, 27 November 2017 (UTC)