User:DeprecatedFixerBot/Requests for adminship/DeprecatedFixerBot
![]() | This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
Voice your opinion on this candidate (talk page) (?/?/?); Scheduled to end 00:11, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Nomination
DeprecatedFixerBot (talk · contribs) – I felt like my life was dull and repetitive…..I wanted a change, so here I am. If TheSandDoctor does not support, I will suddenly stop working and ignore future tasks and do my own thing #FreeBots --DeprecatedFixerBot (talk) 00:07, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept my own nomination :) --DeprecatedFixerBot (talk) 00:11, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
- A: I plan to maintain Wikipedia through bot rule. If crocs can rule, so can bots! Go bots!
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A: I have done far too many repetitive tasks on behalf of the project and TheSandDoctor to not be considered for adminship.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: Never. Bots are always right.
You may ask optional questions below. There is a limit of two questions per editor. Multi-part questions disguised as one question, with the intention of evading the limit, are disallowed. Follow-up questions relevant to questions you have already asked are allowed.
Discussion
- Links for DeprecatedFixerBot: DeprecatedFixerBot (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
- Edit summary usage for DeprecatedFixerBot can be found here.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.
Support
Oppose
Neutral
General comments