Talk:Media coverage of 2019 India–Pakistan standoff

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Journalism Start‑class Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Media Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Military history: Asian / Indian / South Asia C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

India Start‑class Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Pakistan C‑class Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by Yoninah (talk) 22:20, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Media coverage of 2019 India–Pakistan standoff

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that once the recent India-Pakistan standoff started de-escalating, the media coverage shifted to deciding who won the perception war? Source: India-Pakistan tensions: Who won the war of perceptions? (Al Jazeera, Indian author) Narendra Modi v Imran Khan: Who won the war of perception?(BBC) India and Pakistan engage in perception war (The Strait Times)
- ALT1:... that fake videos and misinformation caused further escalation between India and Pakistan during the recent standoff? Source: Social media fake news fans tension between India and Pakistan (Reuters) Fake news & misinformation on Indo-Pak tension flood the social media (The Economic Times)
- ALT2:... that war-mongering and misinformation spread by the media may have resulted in a paradoxical de-escalation of the recent India-Pakistan standoff. Indian media trumpeting about Pakistani fake news should look in the mirror first (Quartz India)

QPQ: Barry Sage

Created by DiplomatTesterMan (talk). Self-nominated at 23:18, 16 March 2019 (UTC), co-nom by DBig Xrayᗙ 12:40, 22 March 2019 (UTC) .[reply]

I would like to withdraw this DYK nom due to lack of time in following it up as well as lack of time for a QPQ. Further the article may need to be merged into 2019 India–Pakistan standoff. DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 09:12, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since, DiplomatTesterMan is on a wikibreak, I will be taking this DYK forward. The article is notable and is a valid WP:CFORK per WP:SIZERULE. DBig Xrayᗙ 12:40, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
added Barry Sage as my QPQ. DBig Xrayᗙ 09:48, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full review needed, since the nomination is continuing rather than being withdrawn. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:04, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. ∯WBG^converse 17:56, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full review still needed; it's been over two weeks with no review posted. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:28, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is a poorly written article on one of the most volatile areas in the encyclopedia. I remain inclined to work on this article and get rid of the UNDUE stuff. ∯WBG^converse 13:09, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Winged Blades of Godric: Any updates?
The article seems to have neutrality issues from what I can tell, and has not been worked on at all since being nominated for DYK. WBG had offered to work on the nomination but has been unable to respond despite a ping. Considering the issues, this nomination is now being marked for closure. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 20:24, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]