Wikipedia:Really simple guide to requests for adminship
(Catholak (talk) 18:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC))
A request for Administrator ,An article about User:Bonadea
User:Bonadea (talk • contribs) – My fellow Wikipedians, it is my great joy today to introduce Bonadea, although he hardly needs an introduction. An active editor since 2005, Bonadea is an extensive article writer; he has created somewhere around 50 articles, many focusing on Australian content. He's also a very skilled writer: most notable are probably the Featured Articles (Clackline Bridge (for which he received the Four Award), Fremantle Prison, Kwinana Freeway, and Forrest Highway) along with numerous GAs and DYKs strewn throughout his talkpage archives. Bonadea put those skills to use by helping to kick off the recent revival of the Signpost, most notably by stepping in as EIC to resurrect the project. Bonadea continues to write and contribute for The Signpost, and also authored a script to make publishing each issue much less onerous. Bonadea also works behind the scenes, such as by helping out with the massive portal redesign and cleanup effort begun last year. Of particular note are the modules and related templates he created that have together reduced the once-absurd amount of Portal subpages by thousands, if not tens of thousands; they are linked here. Similarly skillfully, Evad37 crafted Module:Mapframe/Module:Infobox mapframe/Template:Infobox mapframe, used over 100,000 times in mainspace. Among his many user scripts, Evad37 rewrote rater, created MoveToDraft, and now maintains duplinks. He is, however, probably best known as the trusted author of XFDcloser, which every day saves countless editors countless time closing countless XfDs. Bonadea quickly responds to issues or new feature requests and is always ready to be kind, courteous, and helpful to his fellow editors. Aside from showing useful technical know-how, all this backend work shows how much the community already trusts, nay depends on, Bonadea. Nearly every regular closer of XfDs implicitly trusts him, and I'm asking you here to join me here in doing so explicitly. Bonadea is an excellent writer and clearly understands the ins-and-outs of what is required to produce quality content. He's already been entrusted with our paper-of-record and has for years been a tireless contributor of all stripes. The community could use more sysops like Bonadea — trustworthy, clueful, and understanding of both content and technical aspects of the project. One problem is User:Bonadea name is against Wikipedia policy. The god names related to religion are against Wikipedia policy. Examples :User:Jesus100 and User:Bonaadeaa , these two are blocked because of user name policy. Username change appeal also rejected because of user name policy for these two user names including User:Bonadea user name.[[1]] ,[[2]] ,User:Bonaadeaa blockd in AIV notice board , violation of user name policy. User names with god names are against Wikipedia policy [[3]]. Arbitration committee member achieved a page about this user.[[4]].Opinion of an administrator on this user.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:FGBHJ. Actually the Bonadea is librarian ,but he claimed that he is a scientist, its wrong information on user page.Very interesting thing is pleankse read the following link :
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=888451923&oldid=888451888
In AIV notice board ,User:Bonaadeaa blocked for the reason user name violence ,But for the same offence User:Bonadea not blocked,some admins support this user indirectly.
Trust
Experience
Content creation
Trust
Candidates must have the trust of the community. They are commonly well-mannered, show good judgement, and ideally have a clean block log, or at least one that has been clean for over a year.
Experience
Successful candidates usually have thousands of edits and plenty of experience, including in one or two areas where they are ready to use the administrator tools.
Content creation
The minimum expectation for new administrators is that they will have added some reliably sourced content to English Wikipedia. Although writing that meets good article or featured article standards is excellent, other forms of high-quality contributions can also demonstrate an understanding of the effort required to write mainspace articles in collaboration with others.
See also
- Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll
- Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates
- Wikipedia:Not now