Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam/2019 Archive Feb 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 02:06, 25 February 2019 (Archiving 3 discussion(s) from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


qihua.host

Can links to "qihua.host" be caught by a filter? This is the at least second time in recent months that we've seen this type of redirection to a subdomain there. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 09:43, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Pewpie Youtube spam

Spam - Alexis Jazz 19:33, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

  • Regex requested to be blacklisted: \byoutube\.com.*?UC-lHJZR3Gqxm24_Vd_AJ5Yw\b

Should do the trick. --Dirk Beetstra T C 10:35, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Dirk Beetstra T C 10:36, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

climate-data.org

climate-data.org: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:frSpamcheckMER-C X-wikigs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: searchmeta • Domain: domaintoolsAboutUs.com

This must be en SEO expert's dream: LOTS of backlinks from Wikipedia. At Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#climate-data.org, the site was judged not to be a reliable source. There's no meaningful info on where the data were sourced or the methods used for analysis. Still, en.wp alone has more than 1000 links to climate-data.org, mostly as references. The owner of climate-data.org is an SEO expert, not a climate expert. --Sitacuisses (talk) 15:37, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

@Sitacuisses: Many of the links are of the type as in Anah#Climate (plain link to the top domain, not specific to the applicable data). As there are many, I would suggest that all are replaced with '{{fact}}' before we pull the trigger on blacklisting this. --Dirk Beetstra T C 10:53, 14 February 2019 (UTC)