Jump to content

Talk:Comparison of cryptography libraries

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 17:48, 15 February 2019 (Signing comment by 205.209.193.6 - "Addition of Tink?: new section"). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Bouncy Castle validated and certified

I was trying to update this page to clarify that Bouncy Castle 1.0.0 (latest version is 1.0.1) has been validated to FIPS 140-2 and has been certified. I am not good enough with the markup used on wikipedia to fix this tho. Can someone help? Source: http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/STM/cmvp/documents/140-1/1401val2016.htm#2768 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Omarkj (talkcontribs) 22:38, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Section for Lightweight Block Ciphers

Lightweight Block Ciphers with ARX design have become increasingly popular. The ciphers have a lot of interest for resource constrained devices and Internet of Things. The ciphers include CHAM, LEA, Simon and Speck. It might be a good idea to add a new section for modern Lightweight Block Ciphers designs.

Addition of Tink?

I don't have time to add it now, but I think Tink should be included on this page: https://github.com/google/tink — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.209.193.6 (talk) 17:46, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]