User talk:Veritasphere/Archive 4
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Veritasphere. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
January copyright violation
Your addition to Tashi Zangmo has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Shashank5988 (talk) 18:02, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- To be more specific, your version copied content directly from the references. See this. Shashank5988 (talk) 18:23, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Result was Matching phrases found: 19, you can change some words instead of removing whole content.— Bukhari (Talk!) 18:25, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Shashank5988: You are an experienced user, please guide me properly.-Make love, not war.— Bukhari (Talk!) 18:33, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- From what I've seen, it's one sentence that really can't be written any other way, and the rest of it is just snippets of long-named organizations. Primefac (talk) 18:45, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Not one, but there are at least 3 sentences in total as the above detector shows which were copied. Article size is low as well. "established" can be written as "founded". "After her studies she" could be "After finishing her studies she". Then there was copyvio from BBC source as well,[1] though BukhariSaeed seems to have spelled "higher" as "higer". I would ping Diannaa to investigate this. Shashank5988 (talk) 19:07, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Shashank5988: I've made some changes.— Bukhari (Talk!) 19:31, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- The current version is okay from a copyright point of view. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:30, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Not one, but there are at least 3 sentences in total as the above detector shows which were copied. Article size is low as well. "established" can be written as "founded". "After her studies she" could be "After finishing her studies she". Then there was copyvio from BBC source as well,[1] though BukhariSaeed seems to have spelled "higher" as "higer". I would ping Diannaa to investigate this. Shashank5988 (talk) 19:07, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- From what I've seen, it's one sentence that really can't be written any other way, and the rest of it is just snippets of long-named organizations. Primefac (talk) 18:45, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Shashank5988: You are an experienced user, please guide me properly.-Make love, not war.— Bukhari (Talk!) 18:33, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Result was Matching phrases found: 19, you can change some words instead of removing whole content.— Bukhari (Talk!) 18:25, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Red links in Bangladeshi constituency articles
Thank you for your work to populate Category:11th Jatiya Sangsad members. When you encounter red links, keep in mind that Wikipedia has naming conventions for articles about people. These should be followed to improve readability and maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. The standard is to use a person's most common name.
If a red link uses a different form or transliteration than the one you're most familiar with, it's usually because the red linked form is the most common. If the red link includes a disambiguation, it is usually because the encyclopedia has red links to several different people with the same name, so disambiguation is necessary to avoid ambiguity as those potential articles are created. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:47, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mouni Roy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 14 January 2019 (UTC)