Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 January 9

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cymru.lass (talk | contribs) at 17:50, 10 January 2019 (Template:Politics of Departments: re). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

January 9

Invalid template. There is no policy that outright allows for protection from deletion; even if a page isn't vandalism or a blatant hoax, it may still be eligible for deletion under other criteria. cymru.lass (talkcontribs) 21:27, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete agree. Very weird to have a template that promises a page can't be deleted. Would be ignored in any discussion, which would occur on the merits of the article anyway. --Tom (LT) (talk) 01:23, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not a valid template for use. There is no policy that allows protection of a page from deletion. cymru.lass (talkcontribs) 21:25, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete agree, as above. Very weird to have a template that states a page can't be deleted. Would be ignored in any discussion, which would occur on the merits of the article anyway. --Tom (LT) (talk) 01:23, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough content to justify a navbox cymru.lass (talkcontribs) 21:23, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User: Yaffles1981 it was my intention to develop the politics pages for each department. Happy to take guidance but pages on other countries especially UK and US much more detailed and i didn't want to clutter the main department pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yaffles1981 (talkcontribs) 09:09, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Error in Template:Reply to: Username not given.The only reason to delete this template, as I see it, is if the existing categories end up being deleted on "we shouldn't have this" grounds; then we can G8 this template because it's totally dependent on deleted pages. Nyttend (talk) 00:09, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:02, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Only used 15 times and does not provide a lot of options. BrandonXLF (t@lk) 02:13, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Hover title, Template:H:swl and Template:Span title.
They are all redundant to each other and provide the same functionality. {{Span title}} is basic and has not additional parameters. {{H:swl}} and {{Hover title}} have the same parameters (|dotted= and |highlighted= are the same). We should keep {{Hover title}} due to the higher usage count. BrandonXLF (t@lk) 02:13, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]