Jump to content

Talk:Transient-key cryptography

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Morgan Ginsberg (talk | contribs) at 03:58, 21 December 2018. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconCryptocurrency Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptocurrency, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cryptocurrency on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Untitled

Hi--Sorry, I'm new to this. T-K technology is contained and acknowledged in the ANSI ASC X9.95 standard for timestamping, which is a superset of the X.509 standard that is commonplace on the Internet. Admittedly, it is an emerging technology, but I could find no guidelines with regard to writing articles on emerging technologies on Wikipedia.

Additionally, there do seem to be a number of entries for trademarked terms. For example, the "iPhone" article refers to a trademarked product released in June of this year (http://www.apple.com/legal/trademark/appletmlist.html). Please help. Skulvis 18:03, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Please provide sources to establish the subject's notability. Of course, the need for sources goes beyond notability. Information added to an article must be verifiable, and facts included must be attributed to a reliable source. Thanks. --Evb-wiki 18:05, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, it's not actually a problem to write about a topic that has a trademarked name. It's just that, as a whole, this looks like a posting designed to bring a higher level of visibility to a corporate property, which is frowned upon. I'll check out the ANSI standard, to see if that qualifies. Mangojuicetalk 20:48, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can I get some clarification as to what is specifically objectionable in the article? Again, the ANSI ASC X9.95 standard is a national standard that has been developed over the course of many years and has received contribution and endorsement from many commercial and academic organizations. Isn't that a verifiable and reliable third-party source? I am worried that the article will be deleted, and I will have learned little about why. Skulvis 19:15, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed deletion template based on continuing discussion on the talk page of Mangojuicetalk. Skulvis 03:48, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]