Talk:Web scraping
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Web scraping article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 months ![]() |
![]() | Internet C‑class High‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | Computing C‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Web scraping article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 months ![]() |
legal issues section reworked
The legal issues section made several bold and unsourced claims that could be interpreted as scare-mongering. Can someone check out the reworked section? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Quotemstr (talk • contribs) 00:06:14, August 20, 2007 (UTC).
Legal issues again
I'm not starting an edit war, I swear. :-)
First of all, I cleaned up and normalized the references a bit, and made some minor phrasing changes that shouldn't be controversial.
I removed the section about legal action occurring out of the public eye. That information isn't only unsourced: it's unverifiable.
The court cases cited in the article hardly count as defeats. In the Ticketmaster case, the court held that the particular instance of scraping mentioned was not a trespass. In the other cases listed, the claim was for a preliminary injunction only. As I understand it, a preliminary injunction does not set case law, and should not be considered with the same weight as a final decision.
As for the aggregate damage section -- is there a specific source? Maybe I just missed it.
I don't see how the DMCA is relevant here either; the cases mentioned in the previous version seem to be covered by normal copyright law. A scraper doesn't necessarily have to circumvent any access restrictions in place on a site, considering that one can act like just a browser. Also, doesn't the DMCA specifically allow circumvention for interoperability? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Quotemstr (talk) (contribs) 02:30, August 21, 2007 (UTC)