Talk:Multiprocessor system architecture

Redundacy

This article seems entirely redundant with Multiprocessing. Even if there is some info currently not in that article the topic shouldn't be split as significant overlap would result. --Zac67 (talk) 09:41, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been proposed to delete because redundant with "multiprocessing".

My opinion is different for two reasons:

1) all encyclopedias describe the terms "multiprocessor" and "multiprocessing" with separate entries (because they are two different concepts) [1][2][3][4].

The question is: why in Wikipedia no ?!

2) - The information described in the "multiprocessor system architectures", ie how the multiprocessors are connected, are not described in the "multiprocessing" entry and nowhere else in the Wiki and these would have been lost.

(only for knowledge I am a super expert in computer design with almost thirty patents in particular in this field (search with google "Zulian Ferruccio patent" and for instance:

   http://www.freepatentsonline.com/result.html?query_txt=Zulian+Ferruccio&sort=relevance&srch=top&search=
   https://patents.google.com/patent/US6314484
   https://patents.google.com/patent/EP0608663A1/ru
   http://patent.ipexl.com/inventor/Zulian_Ferruccio_1.html
   https://patents.google.com/patent/US4928224
   https://patents.google.com/patent/US5870560
   https://patents.google.com/patent/EP0098494A2/en
   https://patents.google.com/patent/EP0396940B1/en
   https://patents.google.com/patent/EP0033915A1

... etc...)

Ferry24.Milan (talk) 13:50, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/multiprocessor http://www.cs.vu.nl/~ast/books/mos2/sample-8.pdf https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/multiprocessor http://www.yourdictionary.com/multiprocessor — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ferry24.Milan (talk • contribs) 14:04, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]