Talk:Earth systems model of intermediate complexity

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article was accepted from this draft on 6 November 2018 by reviewer Catrìona (talk · contribs).

Environment Start‑class

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Overall, fair enough. Comments:

Drop the (EMIC) from the title when moving it to article space.
I'd drop "However, the degree to which higher resolution models improve accuracy rather than simply precision is contested" from the lede and bury it in the text somewhere.
The hist dev is a bit weird, because it covers GCMs too much. It should split off later.
The lede says carbon cycles were previously unincorporated, which is wrong. The main text admits that some GCMs include carbon cycle, which is right.
You can't say a model has 2.5 dimensions without saying what that means.
It seems odd not to mention stuff like running them over glacial cycles.