Jump to content

Talk:GRASP (object-oriented design)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Megabeing (talk | contribs) at 12:52, 24 October 2018 (Connection with SOLID). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconComputing Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Who made up the term G.R.A.S.P. to encapsulate and enumerate a set of OOD principles?

 -- It was Craig Larman  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoltar0 (talkcontribs) 09:24, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply] 

Qstn :Please confirm me that OOPs using Grasp.? or Grasp is seperate OOps.?


There's currently a sentence in the article that reads:

"An example of this is the introduction of a controller component for mediation between data (model) and its representation (view) in the Model-view-controller pattern."

This is not a correct description of MVC. The Controller does not mediate; both the Controller and the View interact directly with the model. I will remove this sentence if there is no objection. 198.204.189.245 (talk) 22:14, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Connection with SOLID

This article says GRASP "is not related to the SOLID design principle", but the SOLID article says SOLID "is closely related to the GRASP software design principles". Which is correct? Tim Ivorson 2018-10-23

The only tangible relationship between GRASP and SOLID is that they apply to object-oriented software design. In my view, considering them to be "closely related" is syllogistic reasoning. --Megabeing (talk) 12:52, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]