Talk:Semantic decomposition (natural language processing)

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article was accepted from this draft on 17 October 2018 by reviewer Legacypac (talk · contribs).

Review needed

Thsi came through AfC. It appears well referenced and detailed but could use a good review by someone that is an expert in this area. A previous creation by tue same writer was deleted Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Self-explaining but the type of page is very different. This one is mich longer amd heavily sourced. This is not a copyvio. Legacypac (talk) 02:51, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Moving back to the more general title

@Uanfala: while the article needs a fair amount of work (regardless of what title it is eventually kept under), I'd argue that this article already includes content about semantic decomposition for contexts other than AI. Most of the content in the article is relevant to semantic decomposition as an algorithmic technique regardless of the intended application of the results, and is thus relevant to fields outside of AI. Several of the cited articles are not primarily about semantic decomposition's AI applications. Moreover, based on my familiarity with the subject in a professional capacity, I don't really see any need for differentiating between semantic decomposition in AI contexts and in more general contexts, as the strategy is ultimately the same (the only difference is what you do with the output). In a similar vein, we don't have separate articles for Part-of-speech-tagging in AI, computational linguistic research, etc., we just have one article for the technique that covers all contexts. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:33, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]