Jump to content

Comparison of multi-model databases

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mrpieces (talk | contribs) at 18:30, 15 October 2018 (Deleted FoundationDB, as it is not a multi-model database. No additional models or access layers are supported or available nor will the team provide these https://apple.github.io/foundationdb/anti-features.html. Also deleted Couchbase, as they do not support multiple data models. It is a document store. A Tinkerpop integration does not count as a data model of the database and is misleading readers.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Comparison of multi-model databases (database management systems).

Database SQL Document Graph Object License Transactions
ArangoDB No Yes Yes No Apache 2 License Full ACID, pessimistic locking, configurable durability
Azure Cosmos DB Yes Yes Yes Yes Proprietary Full ACID within a partition, multiple consistency models
CrateIO Yes Yes No Yes Apache 2 License Eventual consistency, Optimistic concurrency control
EnterpriseDB Yes Yes No Yes Proprietary Full ACID
MarkLogic Yes Yes Yes No Proprietary Full ACID
MongoDB Yes Yes No Yes GNU AGPLv3 Full ACID multi-document
OrientDB Yes Yes Yes Yes Apache 2 License Full ACID, even distributed

References

See also

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Comparison_of_multi-model_databases&oldid=864196242"