Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Persistor.NET

Delete as per nom. Non-notable spam, possibly COI. Xdenizen 23:17, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep As a computer scientist, I can attest this is a genuine framework and is worth keeping. It needs to be put into context, tidied up, expanded, and linked. scope_creep 23:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- We don't accept "Trust me, I'm a doctor." here. If you want to demonstrate that this software warrants an encyclopaedia article, cite sources to demonstrate that the WP:SOFTWARE criteria are satisfied. Uncle G 02:03, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep a software is not inherently notable just because you know it exists or you use it. Keep because they appear to have been mentioned in multiple publications [1] and won multiple awards [2]. However, remove the fluff about the features because no reliable sources I've found go into the details. Kavadi carrier 01:50, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Cleaned up and now asserts notability somewhat. Kavadi carrier 03:13, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]