Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DNA Model Management
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- DNA Model Management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't appear to meet general notability guidelines. Mostly consists of a list of people represented by the firm, for which notability is not inherited would apply. {{u|zchrykng}} {T|C} 21:46, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
- How is this agency any different from any other agency that has a Wikipedia article? Look at the page for IMG Models for example. How is THAT more notable than this? It also only has 3 references. Lupine453 (talk) 21:54, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Lupine453: Thank you for pointing that out, just created an AfD for it. Also, please see other stuff exists.
{{u|zchrykng}} {T|C}21:59, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Lupine453: Thank you for pointing that out, just created an AfD for it. Also, please see other stuff exists.
- How is this agency any different from any other agency that has a Wikipedia article? Look at the page for IMG Models for example. How is THAT more notable than this? It also only has 3 references. Lupine453 (talk) 21:54, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH; a search for source turns up only trivial mentions or mentions in passing, I.E nothing in depth that is actually concerned with the company. The nom is absolutely correct to point out WP:NOTINHERITED, as in the case DNA Model Management does not inherit notability from notable people it has worked with in the past.--SamHolt6 (talk) 22:25, 4 October 2018 (UTC)