Jump to content

Talk:Marzullo's algorithm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 11:10, 4 October 2018 (Signing comment by 203.114.225.229 - "Time Complexity of Sorting Algorithm: new section"). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Removal

True or false: RickK knows how to get this article's link off of the Recent Changes header. 66.245.70.19 22:51, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Method

I added some more information on what this algorithm does. I had to leave the method section pretty blank because I don't yet understand the algorithm (and I'm still looking for a good description of it online). Some of the links are in red still, I also need to examine them. RJFJR 01:36, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Symbol substitute

Is there a symbol for plus-or-minus better than +/- ? RJFJR 01:37, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Additional parameter

I was pointed to this entry by a student of mine. Leslie Lamport coined the term Marzullo's algorithm.

It's usually expressed with an additional parameter - the maximum number of estimates that can be correct - since without such a parameter it's hard to say what it computes. You can think of it as a generalization of a Von Neumann voter (think triple module redundancy) where the values are intervals rather than points. User:KeithMarzullo (talk | contribs) 14:20, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Time Complexity of Sorting Algorithm

Isn't the complexity of sorting an integer is O(n). If I understand it, NTP uses fixed precision number for time, hence the offset can be sorted as if it is integer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.114.225.229 (talk) 11:09, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]