User talk:Vavasharp

Deletion discussion about White Rose cycle route

Hello, Vavasharp,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether White Rose cycle route should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Rose cycle route .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

L3X1 (distant write) 02:24, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of National Cycle Network routes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Appleby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Cycle Route 76, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Haddington and Ayton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]