Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MSXML

MSXML

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article should be deleted as it is not notable and there are no independent sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.142.216.205 (talk) 08:54 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:19, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Google scholar reveals significant number of references, isbn 978-1861005892 is also significant. A number of these may not be independent but I think we would be hard pressed to dismiss everything. Can nominator confirm due diligence has been given to WP:BEFORE? There has also been significant unconstructive editing on the article prior to nomination.Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:10, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as it has received significant coverage in reliable academic sources and book coverage and therefore passes WP:GNG. The disruptive editing of the article suggests a negative COI, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 14:38, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
'Keep It was a big product, used by everybody, everywhere, back in the day. scope_creep (talk) 08:31, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]