Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CLARION (cognitive architecture)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Martial BACQUET 23:41, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CLARION (cognitive architecture)

Promotional. Delete. - Mike Rosoft 21:54, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:N; nowhere near notable unless sources are provided. NASCAR Fan24^{(radio me!)} 22:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletions. —Pete.Hurd 03:05, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Barring sources coming up in AFD. • Lawrence Cohen 04:44, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There are several sources linking to the CLARION cognitive architecture. In addition to a list of about 50 peer-reviewed journal articles in top journals in artificial intelligence and psychology (http://www.cogsci.rpi.edu/~rsun/clarion-pub.html), CLARION is referred to in the Soar (cognitive architecture) entry and the cognitive architecture entry. Also, it has been debated in an international symposium in Stanford University (http://www.isle.org/symposia/cogarch/archabs.html).

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Helies (talk • contribs) — Helies (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

keep Per Helies (who may be an SPA, but whose point seems irrefutable) peer reviewed publications & book of CLARION papers by numerous authors, published by Cambridge University Press. Seems as encyclopedic as any other cognitive architecture. Pete.Hurd 14:43, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. CLARION is a cognitive model comparable to ACT-R and Soar, both of which are listed in wikipedia. To see its notability, also consult cognitive scientists who work in this area. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.76.121.174 (talk) 14:53, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - appears to be notable. Wikidemo 14:38, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - notable:

see an article in another online encyclopedia: http://www.calt.insead.edu/Encyclopedia/index.php?pagename=cognitive%20architectures

see an objective, third-party academic review of CLARION: http://www.ai.rug.nl/~niels/publications/architectures.pdf

and simply do a Google search on "CLARION cognitive architecture" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.113.89.45 (talk) 17:10, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.