Talk:MSXML

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Microsoft Windows: Computing Start‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

MSXML 3.0 has namespace MSXML2, but MSXML 2.5 has namespace MSXML. Thus they are not compatible. It is required to verify correctness of "CLSIDs and ProgIDs it exposes have been subsumed by MSXML 3.0" AZiubin (talk) 16:20, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have found that TYPELIB resources of msxml.dll includes "namespace MSXML", but in msxml3.dll it includes "namespace MSXML2", so MSXML 2.5 and MSXML 3.0 have incompatible type libraries, which is critical for compiling phase. I have verified that program (or dll library), which compiled with MSXML 2.5 type library can run with MSXML 3.0 installed. AZiubin (talk) 16:58, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

XML-based application?

Can someone give examples for Windows-native XML-based applications? --80.139.14.165 (talk) 21:58, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dumb questions

I realize that an article titled MSXML is bound to be pretty technical in nature but I'm wondering if it could be somewhat less so.

For example, would it be reasonable to expect the article to address the questions "is it safe to uninstall MSXML from a Windows XP system?" "What might stop working if MSXML is uninstalled?"

Thanks, Wanderer57 (talk) 00:52, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Security Issues

Please open a new section in order to discuss the security importance of that piece of code in modern Microsoft OS's since Vista (7,8). There is an urgent update for this core code as well as the core of Visual Studio among others in order to quickly close some fatal open in-hooks. Please give us a comprehensible view of embedding this parts (XML cores) in that modern design (W7,8) Thanks for your really important work to bring enlightning in a quick changing IT world... --Cosy-ch (talk) 07:02, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion

This article should be deleted as it is not notable and there are no independent sources — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.142.216.205 (talk) 08:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]