Jump to content

Comparison of multi-model databases

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GermanJoe (talk | contribs) at 11:39, 23 August 2018 (ce - sort). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Comparison of multi-model databases (database management systems).

Database SQL Document Graph Object License Transactions
ArangoDB No Yes Yes No Apache Full ACID, pessimistic locking, configurable durability
Azure Cosmos DB Yes Yes Yes Yes Proprietary Full ACID within a partition, multiple consistency models
Couchbase Yes Yes No[1] Yes Apache Single document[2]; Single server or distributed
CrateIO Yes Yes No Yes Apache Eventual consistency, Optimistic concurrency control
EnterpriseDB Yes Yes No Yes Proprietary Full ACID
FoundationDB Yes Yes Yes No Proprietary Full ACID, multi-key, cross-node
MarkLogic Yes Yes Yes No Proprietary Full ACID
MongoDB Yes Yes No Yes Proprietary Full ACID multi-document
OrientDB Yes Yes Yes Yes Apache Full ACID, even distributed

References

  1. ^ "Graph API for Couchbase (3rd-party library for graph queries)". github.com.
  2. ^ "Entity Relationships and Document Design".

See also