Talk:Java virtual machine/Archive 1
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions about Java virtual machine. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Old discussion
J2SE 5 is now knows as Java SE 5. Shouldn't that be changed?
- http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5/index.jsp and other Sun pages still clearly show J2SE so I think it should not be changed to SE just yet.Harborsparrow 15:18, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
--- ToDo. Verify "Bytecode verifier" paragraph with [http://db.usenix.org/events/vee05/full_papers/p153-yunhe.pdf Virtual Machine Showdoxecuted VM instructions, and that the resulting register code is 25% larger than the correpsonding stack code. The increased cost of fetching more VM code due to larger code size involves only 1.07% extra real machine loads per VM instruction eliminated. On a Pentium 4 machine, the register machine required 32.3% less time to execute standard benchmarks if dispatch is performed using a C switch statement. Even if more efficient threaded dispatch is available (which requires labels as first class values), the reduction in running time is still around 26.5% for the register architecture." --mj 20:55, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Native java processors
A link to. --Javalenok 13:28, 21 December 2006 (UTC)