Talk:Reverse domain name notation
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Opening heading
- Should this page be deleted and redirected to Reverse_DNS_lookup? -- 134.159.99.8 20:54, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- No. This page is about the computer component naming convention used by Java, Apple, and possibly others. The opening paragraph explicitly states that it is not to be confused with Reverse DNS lookup, which it has nothing to do with. Harperska (talk) 05:31, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Suggest to remove/archive this if not needed anymore.--invenio tc 01:44, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
- No. This page is about the computer component naming convention used by Java, Apple, and possibly others. The opening paragraph explicitly states that it is not to be confused with Reverse DNS lookup, which it has nothing to do with. Harperska (talk) 05:31, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Examples
- Examples should be more generic.
- maps.google.com -> com.google.maps etc. --86.134.154.148 (talk) 13:32, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- Is that still an issue? The current example of "com.example.MyProduct" seems pretty generic and descriptive. Suggest to remove/archive this if not needed anymore. --invenio tc 01:44, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
History
The history section gives a false assumption, although technically true. Reverse-style DNS names are much more basic and have been around for much longer than Java. In the old days of computing, many addresses were in the style now called reverse, but I can't find a good reference right now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.85.42.110 (talk) 18:24, 21 July 2008 (UTC) Ah, found my reference on FOLDOC: big-endian, definition 2 I guess it wasn't "many." Well, there were also bang paths... 74.85.42.110 (talk) 02:10, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
DBus
DBus uses reverse-DNS, separating components with a slash instead of a period, as unique identifiers (I think for interfaces or objects). I think this is notable enough to be in the article.190.188.180.148 (talk) 22:42, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Monotone
Monotone also uses Reverse-DNS for unique branch names as explained in their manual[1].Yselkowitz (talk) 07:53, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Intro
- To me Reverse domain name notation is not the same as Reverse DNS as such, plus the article's name should be highlighted. I'm therefore suggesting to change the intro from
The Reverse-DNS is a naming convention for the components, packages, and types used…
- to
The Reverse domain name notation is a naming convention for the components, packages, and types used…
Rename
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Consensus was to expand the abbreviation. No consensus on what if any hyphens are needed. Vegaswikian (talk) 07:29, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Reverse-DNS → Reverse domain name notation — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.228.16.92 (talk • contribs) 01:15, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Comment: Seems a good candidate for WP:BOLD, and generally support but it seems like the MOS suggest hyphenation, either Reverse-domain-name notation or Reverse domain-name notation. --Pnm (talk) 03:33, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
"Rationale" section
Is this article a stub? Readers coming here will certainly be looking for a description of the point of reverse-dns name notatation; right now it leaves them hanging. From the GNU mailing list link in the article, I gather that the purpose is to use the existing domain name ownership infrastructure to prevent name collisions rather than (insert the scheme in question here) having to deal with that themselves. However, I am just one of those readers. Paradox (talk) 05:11, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Remove "Code" section
This article deals with the concept of reverse domain name notation rather than ways to reverse domain names. I suggest the "Code" section be removed. Magic sergeant (talk) 13:38, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- ^ "Monotone documentation, section 1.7".
{{cite web}}
: Missing or empty|url=
(help); Text "http://monotone.ca/docs/Branches.html#Branches" ignored (help)
- All unassessed articles
- Stub-Class software articles
- Low-importance software articles
- Stub-Class software articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Software articles
- Stub-Class Java articles
- Mid-importance Java articles
- WikiProject Java articles
- Stub-Class Apple Inc. articles
- Low-importance Apple Inc. articles
- WikiProject Apple Inc. articles