Module talk:AfC

Requested move 26 June 2018

It has been proposed in this section that Module:AfC be renamed and moved to Module:AfC statistics row.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Module:AfC → Module:AfC statistics row – More descriptive name; current one is too vague {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 21:52, 26 June 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. ∯WBG^converse 08:19, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This seems reasonable, though one of the reasons we picked such a short name was to keep the page size down on Template:AFC statistics. Is there another AfC-related module that would better fit here? — Earwig ^talk 02:51, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment-Please advertise this at WT:AFC and VPT, at the very minimum.In case of scarce-participation, I'm not willing to grant the move.∯WBG^converse 08:21, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I already advertised this at WT:AFC, and don't see why this module in particular requires a notice at VPT. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 10:17, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It might not necessarily need a notice at VPT, but given how many places/bots this module is used, at the very least you'd need to get the bot operators on board so that if/when it does get moved then nothing gets broken. (for the record, I have zero opinion on the final target name). Primefac (talk) 12:10, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do not move this module!!!!

This recent move broke a bunch of pages that were not updated to use the new module name..... There are bots (such as EarwigBot) that automatically update pages like Template:AFC statistics by invoking this module. The move broke this and many other pages and these bots and automated tools are not updated to use what would be the new name that you want to change this to... ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:06, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Oshwah:-I guess there is nothing barring the move shall there exist a consensus and all loose ends (esp. EarwigBot et al) are tied up, along with the move. ∯WBG^converse 08:19, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Winged Blades of Godric - Yeah, we just need to plan the move and execute it when everything is ready is all - I wasn't trying to say that nobody should move this module ever lol. For the record, I agree with the rename and that getting a naming convention that's consistent and that makes sense is important ;-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:38, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]