Jump to content

Talk:Ring learning with errors

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 37.120.92.37 (talk) at 09:19, 25 May 2018. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconArticles for creation C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This article was accepted from this draft on 22 July 2015 by reviewer PotatoNinja (talk · contribs).
WikiProject iconMathematics C‑class Low‑priority
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.
WikiProject iconComputer science C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

WikiProject iconComputing: Security C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computer security (assessed as Low-importance).
Things you can help WikiProject Computer security with:
Article alerts are available, updated by AAlertBot. More information...
  • Review importance and quality of existing articles
  • Identify categories related to Computer Security
  • Tag related articles
  • Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
  • Identify articles for improvement
  • Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
  • Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Why quantum safe?

Is there a proof of some kind as to why RLWE is quantum-safe - or is that question nonsensical? (Meaning, "thought quantum-safe given what current quantum circuits can do.") Jimw338 (talk) 23:51, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there is a proof. "Kind-off". See NP-hard problems.

Quotiens are not subrings

The statement: "The sub-ring is typically the finite quotient (factor) ring formed by reducing all of the polynomials in {\textstyle \mathbf {F} _{q}[x]} {\textstyle \mathbf {F} _{q}[x]} modulo an irreducible polynomial {\textstyle \Phi (x)} {\textstyle \Phi (x)}" does not make sense as quotient rings are not subrings. They might be represented by a subring, but there is a mathematical distinction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.120.92.37 (talk) 09:15, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]