Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Community development planning
Appearance
- Community development planning (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article has one source, but the term 'community development' and 'urban planning' are at times synonymous professional practices. As it is I propose this one be deleted and redirected to urban planning. Randomeditor1000 (talk) 16:22, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 14:19, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 14:19, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. cinco de L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 16:42, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep From a perusal of GBooks and GScholar sources, e.g., The Routledge Handbook of Community Development and Development Planning Concepts and Tools for Planners, Managers and Facilitators, community development planning is a real topic with plenty of sourcing to meet notability per WP:GNG. It might refer to the development of communities or, in the sense used in the article and the Routledge book, community stakeholder engagement in the development process. While there is overlap, it doesn't seem synonymous with urban planning, as such projects could be very local or rural in scope. A notable topic that looks different than urban planning suggests keeping the article. --Mark viking (talk) 10:36, 17 May 2018 (UTC)