Jump to content

File talk:User-FastFission-brain.gif

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JakobSteenberg (talk | contribs) at 08:28, 27 April 2018 (Assessment: Anatomy: field=neuro (assisted)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconMedicine: Radiology FM‑class
WikiProject iconThis file is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
FMThis file does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This file is supported by the Radiology task force.
WikiProject iconAnatomy: Neuroanatomy FM‑class
WikiProject iconThis file is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
FMThis file does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This file has been classified as relating to neuroanatomy.

I think it should be a multi-slice MRI video, rather than fMRI. Can anyone check that?

Doesn't look like a fMRI to me either --WS 13:20, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
It was done here, if you want to check out the distinction. I'm not aware of the difference, personally. This animation was made by me from a file they gave me which featured many little slices of the brain on difference axis. --Fastfission 17:46, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It is a structural, not a functional MRI (MRI not fMRI). I think it is a t2 weighted image. High field magnets, such as the one at Berkeley (4T) produce fMRI images w/ poor structural resolution which is one clue. But more importantly, no fMRI image would show the skull & vitamin e capsule (left hand side, outside the skull). (Masher)

Animation can cause problems

Good though it is, it's not wise to display a rapidly- changing, animated image without a warning; they're problematic for some people with epilepsy (and other conditions). It's also contrary to the W3C web accessibility standards, which we should strive to meet. Accordingly, I've replacing it with a link, on Magnetic resonance imaging. Other smay want to do likewiase on otehr pages. Andy Mabbett 11:37, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Laugh

I can clearly see you're nuts. --Cyde Weys 01:44, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Post a groin scan and this becomes, "I can clearly see your nuts." --Cyde Weys 01:51, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fission: Looks good to me! Good job, Just had one done ScottFisher 21:15, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]