User:Cusacke494/sandbox
 | This is a user sandbox of Cusacke494. You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the place where you work on your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. Visit your Dashboard course page and follow the links for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |
Article Evaluation Bold text PRIMARY SOURCES You need to have primary and secondary sources in your writing. It shows where you get the information primary sources can be biased and may twist historical views. I kinda feel like if the information was on something we were interested in it would be much easier- my opinion the people on the talk page are talking about how primary sources are like first had testimonies or direct evidence concerning a topic that is being investigated. They are also talking about what they deleted and added and how someone was trying to combine two sentences into one (which made it confusing so that's why they took it out)
Bold text Literature Review The people on the talk page are talking about how literature review and semantic review and survey article and meta-analysis should all be treated as a different account and that each definition may vary based on the topic you are studying everything looked pretty good on this page content wise and it had references and had three different sources living review, review journal and empirical study of literature.