Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unity of Command 2

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete or move to draft. Game has not yet been released, and thus WP:TOOSOON has to be considered. SamHolt6 (talk) 17:33, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As the creator, I'd request to have it moved to draft, as per your suggestion. (if WP:TOOSOON is justified) Wargamer and Rock, Paper, Shotgun are reliable sources which talk about the game's development to a larger extent, although might not be quite enough at this time.Kiksam (talk) 17:37, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly suggest merge and redirect to Unity of Command (video game)#Sequel. Deletion is certainly not the right call and neither is draftifying. Information about an upcoming sequel can and should be included in the first game's article. Regards So Why 18:09, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect per SoWhy. --Izno (talk) 18:23, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - Not everything that isn't released is WP:TOOSOON. In this case, there are four references cited, and they seem pretty ok to me. Maybe a bit forced? Possibly. This informatoin could go into the previously stated article, but as there is media on the sequel, it's not really a cut and dry delete for me. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 09:56, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Even if not a WP:TOOSOON deletion, the WP:GNG requires sustained detailed coverage of a topic (in multiple works), which we don't have here. A merge and redirect to its preceding game makes a lot of sense. --Izno (talk) 20:54, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect per SoWhy. Nomader (talk) 15:29, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. Too soon. Szzuk (talk) 21:10, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]